Unemployment : The language of the crisis

The financial and economic crisis has already put millions of people out of work in the OECD area alone, and the unemployment figures are going to get far worse. What can governments do to ease the suffering?

Anyone who needs proof that we are experiencing one of the worst ever global crises should look at the jobless numbers. Whether for American workers, who have been losing jobs at an average rate of nearly three-quarters-of-amillion jobs per month since last October, or Spanish 20 to 24-year-olds whose unemployment rate stood at 29% in December 2008, a third higher than a year earlier, the language of this economic crisis, written in sudden, steep drops in employment, is global.

In the US, more than 4 million people lost their jobs in the year to February 2009, when the unemployment rate reached 8.1%, its highest level in over 25 years. In Ireland, the unemployment rate was 8.2% in December 2008, 3.5 percentage points higher than one year earlier, and both France and the UK are reporting significant increases in unemployment over the year to January 2009. The 6.9% average unemployment rate across OECD countries recorded in January 2009 represents some 7.2 million more workers who joined the jobless ranks since one year earlier. And there’s worse to come: the OECD projects that unemployment rates will approach 10% in the OECD area by 2010, swelling the numbers of unemployed by about 25 million-by far the largest and most rapid increase in OECD unemployment in the post-war period.

Governments are beginning to respond. Japan has announced some changes in its policies which increase the number of non-standard workers who are eligible for unemployment benefits if they lose their jobs. Finland has reduced the length of time that an unemployed worker needs to have worked previously in order to qualify for benefits. And the French government has proposed extending unemployment benefits to some youth who are ending a fixed-term contract.

In an effort to contain job losses, several OECD countries, including Denmark, Germany and Spain, are considering introducing, or expanding, schemes that subsidise shortened work times for limited periods. These plans usually apply when there is a temporary reduction in the number of working hours due to a slowdown in business activity. In these cases, some of the workers’ loss of earnings are compensated by a state subsidy. This appears to be a sensible policy in this crisis, because so many firms are facing a combination of severe short-term contraction in demand and a major credit crunch, a combination which could force them to lay off workers they would like to keep in the long term.

These subsidies may also be fiscally wise, since intervening while at-risk workers are still employed may ultimately be less costly than the option of waiting for them to lose their jobs and then register as unemployed. On the other hand, the historical experience with short-time subsidies has not been very encouraging since compensation has often gone either to workers who would have been retained by their employers anyway, even without a subsidy, or has ended up supporting firms that proved to be unviable when business conditions improved.

The OECD is working with governments to find ways to minimise these risks by better targeting short-time assistance.To be effective, such responses also need to be temporary to avoid becoming a drag on the economy later on, but they can work.

Unemployment will not improve until the world’s financial system and economic activity get back on track.


2 thoughts on “Unemployment : The language of the crisis

  1. Unfortunately the rise of unemployment will continue and the numbers of unemployment rate will increase and it’s a fact that it is a global issue. It is incredible that the unemployment rate is a third higher than last October. And unfortunately there is worse to come, because there will be 25 million people unemployed. It’s very important that governments are beginning to respond. For example, Japan, Finland and French took the first step to change something – like to chance policies, changes for qualifying for benefits etc. In my opinion also other countries should take the initiative like those 3.

  2. These kind of emergency packages are useful in a short-term view but I think that it´s more important to restructure the way of employees service in a long-term way. More low wages jobs should be created to increase the number of employed labour forces in a country. The USA already increase employment rates in this way but it´s also important to add a social aspect to this low-wages jobs. A small percentage of the salary should be taken to invest it into health care funds for cases of retirement of injuries. That´s important for employees to be covered in case of a period of illness. Furthermore, health insurance is something which motivates every worker.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s